Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200307042048.39521.shridhar_daithankar@nospam.persistent.co.in обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Friday 04 July 2003 20:36, Rod Taylor wrote: > > 2. Postgresql uses shared memory being process based architecture. Mysql > > uses process memory being threaded application. It does not need kernel > > settings to work and usually works best it can. > > MySQL has other issues with the kernel due to their threading choice > such as memory limits per process, or poor threaded SMP support on some > platforms (inability for a single process to use more than one CPU at a > time regardless of thread count). > > Threads aren't an easy way around kernel limitations, which is probably > why Apache has gone for a combination of the two -- but of course that > adds complexity. Correct. It's not debate about whether threading is better or not. But it certainly affects the default way with which these two applications work. Shridhar
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: