Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux

BSD/OS supports:
The pthreads library conforms to IEEE Std1003.1c(``POSIX'').

How is that different from UNIX98?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Philip Yarra wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:58 am, AgentM wrote:
> > According to POSIX 1003.1c-1995, no such mutex-altering function exists.
> 
> Thanks for the info - useful to know.
> 
> > lock the mutex- potentially again). Either that or the recursive locks
> > can be eliminated.
> 
> Avoiding recursive locks is my preference - the only two I have found ought to 
> be easy to avoid.
> 
> > Just for the record, OS X, Solaris 5.8, FreeBSD 4.8, and LinuxThreads
> > support the UNIX98 version, so perhaps this isn't so important after
> > all.
> 
> Add Tru64 (aka OSF1, aka DEC Unix) to that list. Just checked it.
> 
> Regards, Philip.
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>       joining column's datatypes do not match
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073