Re: RServ patch to support multiple slaves (sorta)

That was my feeling, but the author wasn't sure about the patch either,
hence it was backed out.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > > Patch applied.  Thanks.
> > >
> > > > Michael A Nachbaur wrote:
> > > >> Attached is a patch that provides *VERY* limited support for multiple slave
> > > >> servers.  I haven't tested it very well, so use at your own risk (and I
> > > >> recommend against using it in production).
> > >    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > > It sounded to me like that patch was intended for comment, not for
> > > application.
> >
> > He said it wasn't all he wanted to do with the code, but that it did
> > work.  With so few rserv patches, it seems like something we should get
> > in, but maybe not?  Other comments?  I am not sure myself.
> 
> Considering how many ppl have commented in the past how rserv was broken
> anyway ... ?  I'd say it can't hurt anything ...
> 
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073