Re: JDBC project / CVS moving to GBorg ...
От | snpe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC project / CVS moving to GBorg ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200306251609.07337.snpe@snpe.co.yu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JDBC project / CVS moving to GBorg ... (Erik Price <eprice@ptc.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Hello, Pleasedont use sf.net cvs.It is very slow regards Haris Peco On Wednesday 25 June 2003 12:43 pm, Erik Price wrote: > Dave Cramer wrote: > > What does everyone think about this? > > > > If it has to move, there are other options besides gborg. > > > > codehaus.org is one, they have all the tools installed already to build > > the driver, and the exposure there may be beneficial. > > I'm not familiar with either of those, but as long as the move doesn't > inhibit JDBC development (and I can't imagine that it would), I wouldn't > be concerned either way. I'm curious why SF.net is not an option, > simply because that is where I've noticed most open source projects are > stored. And if exposure is a factor, what about java.net? (I didn't > realize there were any other Postgres JDBC drivers.) > > > The opportunity to goto a Maven build exists there too. This is one step > > better than ant. > > I understand the benefits of Maven but are a lot of people using it? > > > Please feel free to express your opinions on this matter, good or bad. > > This will likely happen in the next 2 weeks regardless. > > I am not using a CVS build, so my opinion should be taken with a grain > of salt, but presumably any changes that affect the CVS build will > eventually affect us binary users. > > > Erik > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: