Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200306230257.h5N2vfT16430@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I sure want two-phase commit. I don't remember it as being rejected, > > and we certainly need it, independent of replication. > > Is 2PC a real-world solution to any real-world problem? I have never > seen a satisfactory explanation of what you do when you've reported that > you're ready to commit and no confirmation ever comes back. Sooner or > later you must violate the protocol in one direction or the other (ie, > commit without confirmation or roll back in violation of your promise > of being able to commit). > > I think it's a cool-sounding phrase that does not actually work in > practice. I think 2PC can be used to build more complex features, like using dblink for cross-db modification queries. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: