Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030622132317.A95856@hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > > > I spent weeks doing hash aggregates, weeks doing IN-subselect > > optimization, and am in the middle of many weeks on FE/BE protocol > > improvement. I am sorry that you don't see these as killer features > > ... but they are all things that we desperately needed to do. > > > > Yes, I know they are _very_ needed, but they don't increase > functionality the way Win32 or PITR would do. They don't increase functionality for whom? When someone is comparing PostgreSQL to Oracle, as an example, for consideration in a project, I would think that speed would be one thing that they would consider key 'functionality' in that comparison ... no? I'll never use a Win32 port ... so Tom's work on optimizing queries is more important to me then a Win32 port is ... 'functionality' is completely in 'the eye of the beholder' ...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: