Re: trigger : emulate "instead of" with before ?
| От | Jeff Eckermann |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: trigger : emulate "instead of" with before ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20030613135010.71562.qmail@web20805.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | trigger : emulate "instead of" with before ? ("Albrecht Berger" <berger1517@gmx.ch>) |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
I believe that if you return NULL from the trigger function, the delete will not actually be done. You could set the value of the delete flag by reference to OLD.fieldname. I have not actually done this myself, so caveat emptor. --- Albrecht Berger <berger1517@gmx.ch> wrote: > Hello, > I need a trigger which is updating a delete flag of > a row instead of > deleting it physically. > > How do I implement a trigger which doesn't execute a > delete without raising > an exception > in plsql ? > > CREATE TRIGGER trigger1 BEFORE DELETE ON table1 > FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE setDeleteFlag (); > > If I use > RAISE EXCEPTION "..." > the delete statement isn't executed, but I think the > transaction is rolled > back too, am I right ? > > So what is the best way to implement something > (Oracle like) like that : > CREATE TRIGGER trigger1 INSTEAD OF DELETE ON table1 > FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE setDeleteFlag (); > > thx > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: