Re: LAST_INSERT_ID equivalent
От | Bruno Wolff III |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LAST_INSERT_ID equivalent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030612182315.GA4978@wolff.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LAST_INSERT_ID equivalent (Erik Price <eprice@ptc.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: LAST_INSERT_ID equivalent
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 13:44:16 -0400, Erik Price <eprice@ptc.com> wrote: > > > Edmund Dengler wrote: > >Greetings all! > > > >I believe > > select currval('sequence_name'); > >should satisfy your needs. Within a transaction it will stay the same. > > Ed, thanks, this looks like what I was looking for -- > > however, I am concerned by your disclaimer. Can you explain that a > little bit? I read it to mean "if you try to use this technique within > a transaction where you are INSERTing a new record, it will not reflect > the new record's ID". So then in order to determine the new record's ID > I would need to use > > SELECT CURRVAL('sequence_name') + 1; > > within the transaction. No. You just want to use currval. The comment was referring to other transactions calling nextval while the transaction of interest is proceeding.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: