Re: Question regarding keyword checkboxes in database
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question regarding keyword checkboxes in database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200306121343.31404.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question regarding keyword checkboxes in database (Lynna Landstreet <lynna@gallery44.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question regarding keyword checkboxes in database
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
Lynna, > Yes, you're probably quite right. So, I just executed the script I wrote to > create all the tables, and I went with option 2, with one slight > modification - I split the keywords into two tables, one for format-oriented > keyword sets (medium, techniques, etc.) and one for content-oriented ones > (subject, theme, etc.). I think that may make coding the front end somewhat > easier, since they need to be separated that way when they're presented in > search results and what not. Not real sure of your schema, but you might also consider a single keyword table with a "keyword_type" column. Not only would this keep your joins simple, but it would allow you to add an new keyword type in the future. Either way, another victory for normalization! Wahoo! > WRT "if you want to do real programming" - that made me smile, because the > fundamental problem behind this and nearly all my questions on this list and > pgsql-general is that I'm *not* a real programmer! I'm a designer who has > had to expand into more technical areas because the current state of the web > industry makes it a necessity - <grin> At least you're facing up to reality ... I have several friends who keep whining "but why can't I just do Flash the way I did in 1999?" It's not just Web work, btw. I get *lots* more work than most of my programmer friends because I know networks, accounting and litigiation support as well as code; it's just not enough to have just one skill anymore. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: