Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
От | Martin Marques |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200306121005.08056.martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user (Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb@eskimo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mié 11 Jun 2003 12:29, Jonathan Bartlett wrote: > > 3) If your point was to move to a relational database, then you should > choose Postgres. MySQL, although it's SQL, hardly qualifies as > relational MySQL doesn't have relations at all, unless you put the InnoDB module, which stamps down performance. An example I tried to do on a MySQL without InnoDB was: CREATE TABLE testing ( id INT, word VARCHAR(20) REFERENCES other_table("word") ); (knowing that other_table exists (I prefiously created it) and has word as a VARCHAR(20) field). An error is what I got. -- Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera, si podés usar PostgreSQL? ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martín Marqués | mmarques@unl.edu.ar Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica Universidad Nacional del Litoral -----------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: