Re: Estimate of when CVS will be available again?
От | Sean Chittenden |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Estimate of when CVS will be available again? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030609182804.GG65470@perrin.int.nxad.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Estimate of when CVS will be available again? (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> >> Okay, I have CVSup up and available again, which allows you to > >> download the whole repository locally to work on ... is there a > >> strong reason why anoncvs is *required* to the repository with > >> this available? > > > CVSup is a PITA to get setup on OSes other than FreeBSD? > > Building CVSup from source is, um, a challenge (who the heck decided > Modula3 would be a good choice for writing allegedly-portable > software?) You can thank Polestra for that... though you can now build CVSup with pm3 instead of modula-3.. much smaller since pm3 doesn't have any windowing bits. There are rumors trickling around that once KSE is done for FreeBSD (~5.2ish) that one of the guys will rewrite CVSup in C... > And, not everyone wants to store the entire project history locally. You don't have to store the entire projects history... use a tag with an explicit branch: *default tag=RELENG_4 *default tag=RELEASE_7_3_3 or something like that and you get the equiv of an incremental cvs export. > I don't think it's reasonable to expect everyone to use cvsup. Though I holistically agree with this. CVSup is more bandwidth friendly for sure, but cvs(1) is _everywhere_. -sc -- Sean Chittenden
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: