Re: speed w/ OFFSET/LIMIT
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: speed w/ OFFSET/LIMIT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030602190705.GX40542@flake.decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | speed w/ OFFSET/LIMIT (Damien <dm_mailings@abelia-decors.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Try using subselects instead. PGSQL has to do all the joins unless you do a LEFT JOIN so that it knows what rows should be included. It would be nice if the optimizer could recognize if you're jointing to a table that has RI, since it could safely transform to a subselect then, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't do this. On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 03:39:49PM +0200, Damien wrote: > Hi ! > > I'm running a pretty simple select query on a pretty large table (70000 > records). This table has some "flag" fields, each one textually explained by > another table ( flag VARCHAR(2), flag_details VARCHAR(60)) > > SELECT t.* , t1.flag1_details , ... , tn.flagn_details > FROM table t > NATURAL JOIN t1 > NATURAL JOIN ... > NATURAL JOIN tn > ORDER BY main_field OFFSET x LIMIT 50 > > There is no where statement, this query is for display purposes on a web page. > My problem is, where OFFSET is low, execution takes only a few milli-seconds, > but where OFFSET is high (50 last results for example), execution can take 10 > seconds... > Is there anything I can do to speed up such a query ? > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org > -- Jim C. Nasby (aka Decibel!) jim@nasby.net Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: