Re: Static snapshot data

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > After lots of discussion, it seems this is to be applied.
>
> I'm still concerned that this will create problems for nested
> transactions, while saving only an insignificant number of cycles per
> transaction.  I would suggest putting the idea on hold until the
> dust has settled from nested transactions.  If it's still workable
> after that feature is complete, we can shave cycles then.

My feeling was that Manfred/Alvero are dealing with nested transactions,
so if they both want the patch applied, we apply it.  If they want it
back, they can grab it from CVS.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073