Re: Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan
От | Nikolaus Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030531080716.20944.h004.c001.wm@mail.dilger.cc.criticalpath.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Enabling and Disabling Sequencial Scan (Yusuf <yusuf0478@netscape.net>) |
Ответы |
why Sequencial Scan when selecting on primary key of table?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
David, I say go ahead and use it since you get a significant performance gain. This is a special case where you know more about your data than the planer does with general system wide settings. In Oracle you could use "hints". Since there are no hints in PostgreSQL disabling and reenabling an option just before and after a query has the same effect. Regards, Nikolaus On Fri, 30 May 2003 16:33:07 -0400, Yusuf wrote: > > In the application, that I'm working on, I have a query > that'll be a lot > 60% faster if I disable sequential scan forcing it to > you my index. > > Is it bad practice to disable sequential scan ( set > enable_seqscan=false), run my query then enable > sequential scan, > whenever I'm running this query? Why? > > Thanks in advance > > - David Wendy > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to > majordomo@postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: