Re: VACUUM and transaction ID wraparound

On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 02:34:19PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:

> I beleive they are referring to the difference between VACUUM and VACUUM
> FULL. The former is faster and doesn't lock tables, but the latter is
> required to solve transaction wraparound.

It is?  I didn't think VACUUM FULL was ever required.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110