Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron?
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200305201214.03432.shridhar_daithankar@nospam.persistent.co.in обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? (george young <gry@ll.mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Monday 19 May 2003 22:58, george young wrote: > Has anyone run postgres on a beowulf system? > > I'm shopping for a new server. One candidate would be a > quad opteron (64-bit AMD "hammer") machine. Another approach might > be a beowulf of single or dual opterons. I imagine the beowulf > would be a bit cheaper, and much more expandable, but what about > the shared memory used by the postgres backends? I gather that > postgres uses shared memory to coordinate (locks?) between backends? Postgresql will not run on beowulf at all since it is an MPI system and postgresql can no span a single database across machines (yet). Further it won't even run on mosix because mosix does not support shared memory across machines. > > I have a smallish DB (pgdump|bzip2 -> 10MB), with ~45 users logged in > using local X(python/gtk) postgres client apps. Well, you haven't put how many transactions you do, but in general for that sort of DB, a P-IV/512MB RAM and SCSI disk would be more than enough unless you are doing really exotic things with data.. > [Next question is: has anyone used postgres on an opteron at all??] Well, if it runs linux as good as anything else, postgresql will run as good as anything else..:-) HTH Shridhar
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: