Re: Large object corruption
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Large object corruption |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200305031139.38971.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Large object corruption (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Tom, > Not a known issue, and not a very credible report either. LOs use the > same transaction mechanisms as everything else. > > Is this the same client that apparently lost an index to a filesystem > failure earlier today? I wonder just how extensive that failure was... > you might try looking for zeroed pages in pg_largeobject and its > index... Not the same machine, but the same client. I think a lot of their problems= =20 devolve from running PostgreSQL on machines that consistently run out of RA= M,=20 CPU and disk space, sometimes all at once. Also they're in the habit of=20 turning the machines off while running.=20 It's actually sort of an interesting "destruction-test" environment for=20 PostgreSQL, and I really wish they'd give me publishable results, because= =20 their testing, if anything, demonstrates how *indestructable* postgresql is= .=20=20 I just wanted to make sure this was not a known, patchable issue. Thanks! --=20 Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: