Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200305021510.25982.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID) ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Scott, > With that setup, you'd have 15 Gigs for the OS, 4 gigs for swap, and about > 300 gigs for the database. The nice thing about RAID 5 is that random > read performance for parallel load gets better as you add drives. Write > performance gets a little better with more drives since it's likely that > the drives you're writing to aren't the same ones being read. Yeah, but I've found with relatively few drives (such as the minimum of 3) that RAID 5 performance is considerably worse for writes than RAID 1 -- as bad as 30-40% of the speed of a raw SCSI disk. This problem goes away with more disks, of course. -- -Josh Berkus ______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________ Josh Berkus Complete information technology josh@agliodbs.com and data management solutions (415) 565-7293 for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533 and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: