Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ?
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030501124852.GD9725@libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ? ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 08:31:27PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > This is common usage in requirements docs - I suspect it has a government, > perhaps a military origin. Even after vetting and helping to author a great > many requirements docs it still makes me cringe, but then I don't split > infinitives either ;-) <totally ot> It shouldn't make you cringe. According to Fowler (<http://www.bartleby.com/116/213.html>), this version of "shall" is an example of the "pure system" in the distinction between shall and will. So it's neither military nor government in origin, but mediaeval. Anyway, it's not much different from "Thou shalt not steal." </totally ot> A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: