Re: Buffer Cache question....
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buffer Cache question.... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030501122936.GC9725@libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Buffer Cache question.... ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 03:09:52PM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote: > What about commit_siblings and commit_delay? I haven't really played a > lot with those. I would think increasing the commit delay and the number > of siblings should give better, but slightly bursty performance. This depends very heavily on your actual traffic. If you have primarily write activity, it is a definite advantage, because you get a boost from ganging writes to disk. If your traffic leans more toward reads, I find that increasing these settings is a net loss: you just end up waiting for nothing. BTW, it is tricky to construct a correct model load to test this, because you have to model both the load and its distribution. A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: