Re: Buffer Cache question....

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Buffer Cache question....
Дата
Msg-id 200304302047.h3UKl5j01004@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Buffer Cache question....  (Medi Montaseri <medi.montaseri@intransa.com>)
Ответы Re: Buffer Cache question....  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Medi Montaseri wrote:
> I am using PG 7.2 with fsync truned on but still need a more immediate
> write thru.
> Does PG uses the fsync (or open_sync, etc) just for the WAL or for
> tables as well ?

Just for WAL.

> I understand the consequence of limiting buffer cache but my application
> cares more about
> integrity than performance. I'd like to be able to write the data to the
> physical storage ASAP,
> or ideally 100% in sync mode.
>
> I have found that by reducing the checkpoint parameters I can write the
> data to disk sooner.
> For example
>
> checkpoint_segments = 1
> checkpoint_timeout = 30
>
> What else do I have to work with....?

PostgreSQL is already 100% reliable (pull plug and see) so I don't see
any value to changing those parameters.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Erik Ronström
Дата:
Сообщение: check_foreign_key
Следующее
От: Stephan Szabo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: check_foreign_key