Re: Buffer Cache question....
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buffer Cache question.... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200304302047.h3UKl5j01004@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Buffer Cache question.... (Medi Montaseri <medi.montaseri@intransa.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Buffer Cache question....
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Medi Montaseri wrote: > I am using PG 7.2 with fsync truned on but still need a more immediate > write thru. > Does PG uses the fsync (or open_sync, etc) just for the WAL or for > tables as well ? Just for WAL. > I understand the consequence of limiting buffer cache but my application > cares more about > integrity than performance. I'd like to be able to write the data to the > physical storage ASAP, > or ideally 100% in sync mode. > > I have found that by reducing the checkpoint parameters I can write the > data to disk sooner. > For example > > checkpoint_segments = 1 > checkpoint_timeout = 30 > > What else do I have to work with....? PostgreSQL is already 100% reliable (pull plug and see) so I don't see any value to changing those parameters. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: