Re: > 16TB worth of data question
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: > 16TB worth of data question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030429160540.P66185@flake.decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: > 16TB worth of data question (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: > 16TB worth of data question
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 01:01:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > But pg doesn't guarantee internal consistency unless you pg_dump > the database in one command "pg_dump db_name > db_yyyymmdd.dmp". > > Thus, no parallelism unless there are multiple databases, but if there's > only 1 database... It would probably be useful if you could feed a specific transaction id/timestamp to pg_dump, so that it will take the snapshot as of that time. Of course, it'd probably be easiest if you could just tell pg_dump to use X number of threads or dump devices. -- Jim C. Nasby (aka Decibel!) jim@nasby.net Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: