Re: Why is seq search preferred here by planner?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why is seq search preferred here by planner? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200304231253.52051.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why is seq search preferred here by planner? (<mallah@trade-india.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why is seq search preferred here by planner?
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
Mallah, > > The reason that the planner is using a seq scan on personal_account_details is the same as the > > reason for using a seq scan on email_bank; the number of rows which match the condition, > > about 150,000. With that many qualifying rows, a seq scan is faster. > > > But there are two tables here , email_bank and personal_account_details > in personal account details only one row is supposed to match a given userid > as userid is the PKEY , why seq_scan there ? or am i getting the explain wrong ? It doesn't matter whether it's a primary key or not. If your query or subquery condition returns a large number/proportion of rows, a seq scan is going to be faster than an index scan. As far as userid being a key, this affects the planner's *join method*, *not* how the database gets the rows. -- -Josh BerkusAglio Database SolutionsSan Francisco
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: