Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?")

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > Great.  I think it can be made acceptable with little work.
> >
> > IIRC, the reason Jim's patch got bounced was exactly that it offered an
> > implementation of only one policy, with no possibility of extension.
> 
> I read all the comments regarding Jim's patch, but would you mind stating
> exactly what your concern is, Tom?  What do you mean by 'one policy'?

As I remember, the patch only put indexes in one place, and tables in
another place.  We need a general tablespace solution where we can
create tablespaces and put tables/indexes in any of those.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073