Re: Win32 defines

Thanks. Done.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > OK, I have modified the patch to match your suggestions. I also removed
> > the N_PLAT_NLM define because I think that just got in when we were
> > thinking about the Novell port that we cancelled.  Is that correct?
>
> Could you use HAVE_WORKING_LINK instead of HAVE_LINK?  The symbol names
> containing _WORKING_ are sort of standard for cases where the function
> exists but doesn't really work well.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
>
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073