Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?")
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200304171640.h3HGegL23646@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: For the ametures. (related to "Are we losing momentum?") (Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Doug McNaught wrote: > Ben Clewett <B.Clewett@roadrunner.uk.com> writes: > > > > > So does PostgreSQL (pg_dump/pg_dumpall). > > > > I have used this, and it's a great command. > > > > I could not work out from the documentation whether it takes a > > snapshot at the start time, or archives data at the time it find's it. > > The documentation (app-pg-dump.html). As the documentation does not > > clarify this very important point, I desided it's not safe to use when > > the system is in use. > > Ummm, quoting from the pg_dump manpage: > > pg_dump makes consistent backups even if the database is > being used concurrently. pg_dump does not block other > users accessing the database (readers or writers). > > What part of this isn't clear? > > It's safe. pg_dump does all its work inside a transaction, so MVCC > rules automatically guarantee that it sees a consistent snapshot. Too many people have missed that point --- it was too far down in the manual page, after a long discussion about output formats. Now it is right in the first paragraph, which should eliminate that question --- it was almost becoming an FAQ. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: