Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables

On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 10:09:38AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> The real problem with current temp tables is the implementation. I see
> very quick growth of system catalogs with heavy use of temp
> tables(some hundred mega bytes per week on a busy system for
> example). To fix the system catalogs, we have to stop postmaster and
> have to do reindex. This is truly a pain.

This is fixed in 7.4 already.  It wasn't a problem with temp tables, but
with btree indexes.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Endurecerse, pero jamas perder la ternura" (E. Guevara)