Re: Are we losing momentum?
От | ow |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030415191147.72541.qmail@web21408.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Are we losing momentum? (Rob Butler <robert.butler5@verizon.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
--- Rob Butler <robert.butler5@verizon.net> wrote: > I disagree, The cross-db operations would indeed be very nice to > have, but you COULD make things work across DB's from within your > application code if Postgres supported 2PC. Granted this would not > be the best, but it could be done. Sure, anything could be done given time and money. OTOH, why would one want to hand-code joins between tables in different dbs, configure multiple connection pools, etc when all that can be avoided with a RDBMS that supports cross-db operations? And since mySql supports cross-db ops now, mySql could become a very intersting option when they implement all the features they promissed for version 5.0 > Also, if you want to start doing cross-db operations you will need > 2PC to support this. While 2PC may not be needed to support cross-db > operations on two db's on the same server, it would definetly be > needed to do cross-db operations with db's on two separate servers. > Why limit the cross-db operations only to db's on the same server? I'm not saying Postgres has to limit itself to cross-db ops on the same server only. However, if it's much simpler to implement then why not start there? Cross-db ops have been on the Postgres TODO list for several years now and, AFAICT, it does not appear that they will be available any time soon. Thanks __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: