Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform)
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200304101529.05217.shridhar_daithankar@nospam.persistent.co.in обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Caching (was Re: choosing the right platform) (David McKain <dmckain1@ph.ed.ac.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thursday 10 April 2003 15:04, you wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 09:16:36PM -0400, Matthew Nuzum wrote: > > Thanks for all the feedback, this is very informative. > > > > Here are some of the performance suggestions I've heard, please, if I > > mis-understood, could you help me get clarity? > > * It's better to run fewer apache children and turn off persistent > > connections (I had suggested 200 children per server, someone else > > suggested 40) > > Hi Matthew, > > I'm coming in a bit late and slightly OT here, but one common Apache > solution you might want to look at is a "reverse proxy" configuration. > This works very well if there's a good proportion of static vs dynamic > content on your site - if your pages contain a lot of graphics then this > may well be the case. > > To do this, you compile 2 Apache servers listening on different ports on Umm.. AFAIK, if you use fastCGI, persistence of connection should be a lot better and <self drumming on> or OAS Server, which gives you explicit control on how much resources to allocate. </self drumming on> Shridhar
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: