Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions?
От | cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030403125413.CB5E158C03@cbbrowne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? (mlw <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I have been planning to "test" the whole thing with a few .NET > applications. I am currently using expat to parse the output to ensure > that it all works correcty. That, unfortunately, probably implies that your implementation is almost totally non-interoperable. You should put out of your mind the notion of being "correct." Being "correct" is pretty irrelevant if 80% of the requests that come from a VB.NET client fail because Microsoft implemented part of their request differently than what you interpreted as "correct." The point is that "correctness" isn't the thing you need to aim for; what you should aim for is interoperability with the important client implementations. SOAP::Lite, .NET, probably some Java ones, C++ ones, and such. Nobody does "correctness" testing; they do interoperability tests where they try to submit requests to Apache AXIS, .NET, WebSphere, and the lot of other important implementations. If you're testing a server (as is the case here), then the point is to run tests with a bunch of clients. Head to the SOAP::Lite and Axis projects; you'll see matrices describing this sort of thing... -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "ac.notelrac.teneerf@" "454aa")) http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/advocacy.html "Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to using Windows NT for mission-critical applications." --- What Yoda *meant* to say
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: