Re: anyone know what the deal with 64.117.224.149 is?
От | Phil Howard |
---|---|
Тема | Re: anyone know what the deal with 64.117.224.149 is? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030403060136.A12097@hamal.ipal.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: anyone know what the deal with 64.117.224.149 is? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:04:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: | Phil Howard <phil-pgsql-general@ipal.net> writes: | > Does anyone know what the deal with 64.117.224.149 is? | | relay3.pgsql.com is 64.117.224.149. If you're blocking traffic from | there, you are probably losing about a third of the PG list traffic | since a few days ago. | | It'd probably be nice if Marc warned people when he was about to add a | new relay machine, so that those of us who run IP-based filters could | be sure to whitelist it... The reverse DNS was not working on it when I posted. It seems to be working now. Postfix will soft-bounce (450) on failure to get reverse DNS since it can be a transient DNS failure. Now that RDNS is working I'll probably get a little spike flowing in. Thanks for getting the RDNS working. Yes, if people are whitelisting by IP address, knowing these in advance would help. This is one reason I prefer domain based whitelisting. Some day I hope to blacklist the whole internet and whitelist only the good parts. But that's for another mailing list. Now back to our regularly scheduled program. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | Phil Howard - KA9WGN | Dallas | http://linuxhomepage.com/ | | phil-nospam@ipal.net | Texas, USA | http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ | -----------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: