Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030402203936.GL16181@libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 03:25:58PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > the current session. This is kind of an ugly wart on the GUC mechanism, > but I think not difficult to do with an assign_hook (it just has to > refuse non-interactive settings). It may be an ugly wart, but I think it's only prudent. I'd be willing to bet a fair amount that there is a significant overlap between the population which uses Bob's Discount Hardware for 10 million row, ultra-critical databases and the population which likes to twiddle postgresql.conf settings without reading the fine manual. Those folks are going to get burned by this setting unless it is very hard to turn on. (I think the setting is an excellent idea, though, for emergency cases.) I don't usually like making servers totally idiot-proof, but I can just imagine the Slashdot conversations after 7.4 comes out (and for at least 60 or 70 years thereafter): "PostgreSQL just randomly zeroes a page of data! It sucks! Use MySQL instead. It can recover from bad pages on your disk by randomly making up data for you, instead of just writing zeros." A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: