Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200304020942.18320.shridhar_daithankar@nospam.persistent.co.in обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 (Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wednesday 02 April 2003 07:19, you wrote: > > Just switch to FreeBSD and use UFS ;) > > I must say, I found this whole discussion rather amusing on the > sidelines given it's largely a non-problem for non-Linux users. :) > > "Better performance through engineering elegance." Well, this may sound like a troll, but I have said this before and will say that again. I found reiserfs to be faster than ext2, upto 40% at times when we tried a quasi closed source benchmark on a quad xeon machine with SCSI RAID. Everything else being same and defaults used out of box, reiserfs on mandrake9 was far faster in every respect than ext2. I personally find freeBSD UFS to be a better combo based on my workstation tests. I believe freeBSD has a better IO scheuler that utilises disk bandwidth in optimal manner. Scratching (my poor IDE) disk like mad does not happen with freeBSD but linux does it plenty. But I didn't benchmark it for throughput.. Shridhar
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: