Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Yes, rereading the config file would kill my idea --- but what API are
> > we going to pass SET to applications?
> 
> Passing the info up the client-side stack is an issue, yes, but it will
> be so in any case.  If it's not there in the protocol we haven't even
> got a foothold to solve the problem ...
> 
> > Sure, but how are we going to treat SET in the client?
> 
> Not following your concern here.  SET is what it always was.

The question is whether a client-side implementation of autocommit is
going to allow SET to being a transaction when autocommit is off.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073