Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > > > Vadim planned to implement the savepoints functionality
> > > > > using UNDO mechanism. AFAIR it was never denied explicitly.
> > > >
> > > > If you go to the TODO.detail/transactions archive, there was discussion
> > > > of using UNDO, and most felt that there were too many problems of having
> > > > to manage the undo system,
> > >
> > > This is closely related to the basics of PostgreSQL.
> > > Pleas don't decide it implicitly.
> > 
> > We took a vote and UNDO lost --- do you want to do another vote?
> 
> Sorry I missed the vote. Where is it ?

I can't find the vote in the archive.  As I remember, Vadim and a few
others liked UNDO, while more liked the current approach.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073