Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > Neil Conway wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 18:55, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > > Does the change worth the trouble ?
> > > > Please don't break BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY easily.
> > >
> > > If it's important enough, we can provide a GUC option for it.
> > >
> > > My guess is that a GUC option isn't needed, but then again we've been
> > > criticized for disregarding backward compatibility in the past...
> > 
> > I think our policy is going to be that GUC backward compatibility
> > options have to be asked for during beta, unless it is obvious.
> 
> Why should we take the trouble to break the backward
> compatibility in the first place ? The only reason 
> that I can see is that you dislike it. 

The big question is does it make sense to anyone?  I don't think so.

And if someone does, how should it behave when autocommit is off?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073