Re: PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE is unused...
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE is unused... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200303171957.h2HJvAM19554@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE is unused... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
This change will be made to the poll patch: Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@gnu.org> writes: > > ...any reason why it is there at all? > > Good question. Some digging in CVS shows that it was unused even in the > patch that introduced it, and never has been used in any release since. > So it does seem like useless complication. > > However, I think it'd be unwise to remove the constant from libpq-fe.h, > because that would break the application of any poor sod who believed > the documentation and wrote code that actually checks for > PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE. > > I'd be inclined to remove it from the documentation and the library > innards, but leave something like this in libpq-fe.h: > > PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE /* unused; keep for awhile for > * backwards compatibility */ > > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: