Re: pgsql-server/ /configure /configure.in rc/incl ...
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql-server/ /configure /configure.in rc/incl ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200303060433.h264XaQ11718@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql-server/ /configure /configure.in rc/incl ... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-committers |
I assume he just assumed poll() actually polls. I doesn't. It is just like select(). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > >>> Has anyone ever thought about adding kqueue (for *BSD) support to > >>> Postgres, instead of using select? > >> > >> Why? poll() is standard. kqueue isn't, AFAIK. > > > It's supposed be a whole heap faster - there is no polling involved... > > Supposed by whom? Faster than what? And how would it not poll? > > The way libpq uses this call, it's either probing for current status > (timeout=0) or it's willing to block, possibly indefinitely, until the > desired condition arises. It does not sit there in a busy-wait loop. > I can't see any reason to think that an OS-specific API would give > any marked difference in performance. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: