Re: Win32 Powerfail testing
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Win32 Powerfail testing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030305.224927.71087099.t-ishii@sra.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Win32 Powerfail testing ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Win32 Powerfail testing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > So far we found interesting facts. Our Win32 port passes his > > test in most cases. However if power of the machine is turned > > off right after (10 to 20 seconds) the Checkpoint has been > > made, it does not passes his test. So we are thinking that > > there is someting wrong with the checkpoint implementaion for > > Win32 port, which is essentially same as Jan's > > implementation. i.e. using _flushall() instead of sync(). We > > were looking for a fix or an alternative implementaion of > > sync() without success. > > Hi Tatsuo, > > Does this help: > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;66052 Sorry, but it does not help. The page says we could use FlushFileBuffers() to sync the kernel buffer to the disk. Unfortunately, it requires a file descriptor to flush for its argument. Thus it could not be a replacement of sync(). Actually I have modified the buffer manager so that it remembers all file descriptors those have not been synced yet to the disk at the checkpoint time to sync them later. However I found this modification does not help at all with some reason I don't know. -- Tatsuo Ishii
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: