Re: 7.4?
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.4? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030227145730.M17141@mail.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 7.4? ("Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: 7.4?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 12:00:50PM -0700, Ed L. wrote: > stretch, but is a monstrous improvement. I'm assuming eRServer, > rserv, or DBMirror maintains a proper transaction order, even if it's > incomplete. I dunno about dbmirror, but rserv and its bigger cousin both actually apply the current-as-of-snapshot version of the row (which means that if you have multiple changes to the same row, you needn't go through all the iterations when applying the snapshot). I presume the same is true of dbmirror, since it relies on the primary key. > Sounds like PG-R + Spread is tackling that, too. I am learning that, > if PG-R can work as advertised, it removes all my concerns about a > syncronous system. Yes, if it works as advertised, it'd be a _mighty sweet_ piece of technology. A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: