Re: psql patch
От | Jeroen T. Vermeulen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030224181343.GE97071@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:36:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Not without help from the backend --- you have no idea whether a LISTEN > command might have been executed via some user-defined function. True. Hadn't thought of that. The backend does identify a direct LISTEN to the frontend through PQcmdStatus(), but it doesn't say anything about what happens in functions and such. And similar for transactions, I guess. > Again, it's not all that easy to be sure if you're inside a transaction > or not. We looked at this and decided it was impractical to do without > a protocol addition. I don't think I followed that discussion to its conclusion at the time, but it left me with the impression that such an addition was being considered. However I just took a look at the docs for readline and apparently it was designed with select() in mind. So it should be possible to implement this without any cost to scalability: the server doesn't care if the frontend is listening when it sends out the notification, and the frontend can sleep until either a notification or a keypress arrives. Or am I missing something basic here? Jeroen
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: