Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: [Viruschecked]
От | Patric Bechtel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: [Viruschecked] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030220170540.D622A475B47@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:02:06 -0700 (MST), scott.marlowe wrote: Hi, I doubt that it will be for "super-price-conscious" only. I recently saw Western Digital annoucing a 10.000 RPM drive with 36 Gig for serial ATA, <5.2ms access time, about 55 MB/s, for 30% than the SCSI price. That's serious. Together with 5 years warranty and explicit statement about being 24x7x365 capable (which most ATA-drives aren't!). 0.02$... Patric >> I'd see Serial ATA being a "serious challenger" if it allowed you to >> cheaply build some "embarrassingly-parallel" RAID servers where you >> were able to get 16 drives hooked up, each on its own ATA 'bus' for >> about the price of 4-way SCSI. >> >> But the intended market is doubtless the super-price-conscious market, >> which naturally leads to the overall quality of the results being >> pretty compromised. >These guys: >http://www.ide-raid.com/ >will probably make use of serial ata, since they're already making some >very nice, very fast IDE based RAID devices, and very dense (12 disk 3U >units.) PGP Public Key Fingerprint: 2636 F26E F523 7D62 4377 D206 7C68 06BB
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: