Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres:
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200302181104.03817.shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: ("Bodanapu, Sravan" <Sravan.Bodanapu@NextelPartners.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 18 Feb 2003 2:12 am, you wrote: > 3. Please suggest us some tips for setting up a big database to acheive > maximum performance ? well, typically postgresql tries to do things that nobody else in the supply chain will do. If an OS would take care of mirroring of drives, then postgresql won't do it for example. Large tables/database are limited by IO performance. So you need to have maximum IO throughput available for postgresql to perform best. I suggest you look at RAID configurations. SCSI if better. If not, then even software RAID on some OS's like linux should be a good enough option. Of course, put two disk on two channels but that's about it. Basically, postgresql won't do anything out of box to support disk partitioning because that's is an OS's job. symlinking is a poor solution because say if you recreate an index, postgresql will drop the symlink and recreate a file instead. HTH Shridhar
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: