On Monday 17 February 2003 19:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Schmitz <a.schmitz@cityweb.de> writes:
> > I think it is not the same. When I ran the vaccum when no other clients
> > whe= re=20
> > connected to the database.
>
> The vacuum that reports the NOTICEs is not the one that created the
> problem. The scenario I was talking about requires concurrent clients
> during the preceding vacuum.
>
> regards, tom lane
Hi,
ok. I got that one. I was able to reproduce it. but it still doesn't solve the
problem. fact is that I loose data and that is a big problem.
regards
-andreas