Re: set_ps_display on solaris x86
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: set_ps_display on solaris x86 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200302131926.h1DJQZv05700@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: set_ps_display on solaris x86 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: set_ps_display on solaris x86
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh@cs.berkeley.edu> writes: > > Sadly, set_ps_display does not seem to have any effect in solaris > > x86. At least ps only reports multiple postmaster processes and > > arguments. > > IIRC, you have to use the "other" version of ps to see the process > status on Solaris. I forget where it lives exactly, /usr/ucb maybe? Yep, monitoring chapter mentions it: <productname>Solaris</productname> requires special handling. You must use <command>/usr/ucb/ps</command>, rather than <command>/bin/ps</command>.You also must use two <command>w</command> flags, not just one. In addition, your original invocationof the <application>postmaster</application> must have a shorter <command>ps</command> status display than thatprovided by each backend. If you fail to do all three things, the <command>ps</> output for each backend will be theoriginal <application>postmaster</> command line. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: