Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030210105801.E26539@mail.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle ("Fabrizio Ermini" <hermooz@tin.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Fabrizio Ermini wrote: > On 9 Feb 2003 at 17:48, Ben-Nes Michael wrote: > > > also I heard that you cant do transaction within transaction in postgres > > while in Oracle you can. ( im not sure if its true at all ) > > nope... "commit" in Oracle close ALL open transaction. I suspect the point is really that an error inside a transaction in Oracle doesn't force you to roll back to the very beginning. I believe this is listed as "savepoints" in the current TODO. Which reminds me of another feature PostgreSQL has. You can buy an awful lot of _very talented_ developer time with the fees you'd just to use stock Oracle. I don't know why more companies (and to date I have to include my own employer in this category) don't spend just a little of that savings on PostgreSQL development. A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: