Re: Adding // comments (ANSI??)...
От | Sean Chittenden |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding // comments (ANSI??)... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030205023626.GH15936@perrin.int.nxad.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding // comments (ANSI??)... ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
> > I just had a friend over at EDS ask me if PostgreSQL supported // > > comments. It didn't, so I put together a patch for them so that they > > could retain compatiblity across the databases they work on. > > > > I didn't think much of it until I took a gander at the crash-me page > > on mysql.com and I couldn't find a single vendor that supports // > > comments, but it did list // as an ANSI supported comment. ::shrug:: > > I don't have a copy of the spec, so someone more knowledgable in that > > area will have to speak to this or whether or not support for // is > > even wantd, but, here's the patch and regression tests. -sc > > As far as I'm aware, MySQL is the only database that supports '//' > as a comment, and they made it up out of whole cloth... > > ANSI _C_ perhaps... MySQL doesn't support //, unless you meant #. http://www.mysql.com/information/crash-me.php http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Comments.html http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/ANSI_diff_comments.html Hrm, well, sybase, Microsoft, and a thing called "AceDB" do, but I haven't seen high nor low of // being actually referenced as an ANSI sanctioned comment style anywhere. I guess that's just for the archives or the C++/Java impared. ::shrug:: http://manuals.sybase.com/onlinebooks/group-aw/awg0800e/dbrfen8/@Generic__BookTextView/7074 http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/4076a.asp http://www.acedb.org/Cornell/syntax.html -sc -- Sean Chittenden
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: