Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
От | Kurt Roeckx |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030202191340.GA10137@ping.be обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 12:49:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Gavin Sherry wrote: > >> I don't think we should listen on IPv6 just because it is supported. It > >> should be a configuration variable: > >> > >> tcpip_socket = true > >> ipv6 = true > > > We had a huge discussion on this. I think you were away for it. You > > can control what you listen on by modifying pg_hba.conf. > > Can you actually control whether the postmaster is listening by > modifying pg_hba.conf? I don't think so. Why isn't virtual_host used for deciding to what addresses it should listen? It currently only seems to support 1 address, and I don't really know why. Is there a reason you can't make this a list of hostnames/ip addresses? It really is where it belongs. Kurt
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: