Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
От | Steve Crawford |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030130162205.7EA85103EF@polaris.pinpointresearch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
What about cases where I only want one or the other? Would a simple method exist to limit input to v4 or v6 only? Also, what are the implications to functions such as network_sub, network_cmp, etc. when given mixed v4/v6 inputs as could easily happen if the two are freely mixed in the same data type? Cheers, Steve On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:04 pm, Tom Lane wrote: > "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > > Maybe we should create a new type 'inet6'??? > > I'd lean towards allowing the existing inet and cidr types to store both > v4 and v6 addresses, if at all possible. Is there a good motivation for > doing otherwise? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: