Re: IPv6 patch

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > However, the server log messages stating an IPv6 socket was not made is
> > only printed if the binary supports IPv6.  The message seems to be a
> > compromise between those who wanted a separate IPv6 GUC/flag and those
> > who wanted it to silently fail on IPv6.
> 
> I'm not sure.  Those who wanted silence don't get any silence and those
> who wanted a configurable hard failure get neither the configurability nor
> any failure.

That is the compromise.  Neither gets what they want, but the final
solution is closer to each.  This is probably the best we can do.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073